In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism by clicking the appropriate radio button.
Original Source Material
Student Version
Murdoch's own moral philosophy has a great deal in common with the work of philosophers like Richard Rorty, Stanley Cavell and Martha Nussbaum. She shares with them not only the attempt to work out a chastened, usable, non-metaphysical discourse and vocabulary for a qualified humanist ethics but also their conception of the novel as an embodiment of moral philosophy.
References:
BĂ©nyei, T. (2003). Angelic omissions: Iris Murdoch's angels and ethical criticism. European Journal of English Studies, 7(2), 151-163.
Murdoch's conception of the novel as representing an important manifestation of moral philosophy is not unique. In fact, this expression by Murdoch shares a great deal with philosophers such as Nussbaum and Cavell who, like Murdoch, tried to formulate a specific lexicon and discussion for ethics.




Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism

Respuesta :

Word for Word I hope this helps

Paraphrasing plagiarism is true for the student version above is a reference to the original source.

What do you mean by Plagiarism?

Plagiarism may be defined as an act of stealing or capturing text from any other similar sources. It is considered one of the crimes in literature.

Looking at both the context given above, it illustrates that the students perform an act of paraphrasing plagiarism.

Therefore, the correct answer to this question is paraphrasing plagiarism.

To learn more about Plagiarism, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/397668

#SPJ2