Respuesta :
This statement contradicts Leahy's opinion. Leahy believed that the Japanese were about to surrender, but they had shown no willingness to surrender in the past. In addition, the casualty rates were very high. Although many people were killed in the atomic blast, a full Allied assault on Japan would likely have killed even more people.
This statement goes against Leahy's viewpoint. Leahy thought the Japanese were poised to surrender, but they had previously demonstrated no readiness to do so.
Furthermore, the casualty rates were extremely high. Although the atomic detonation killed many people, an all-out Allied assault on Japan would have undoubtedly killed many more.
About contradicts Leahy's opinion:
- Leahy believed that sacrificing the lives of so many innocent women and children was wrong, and that Japan was ready to surrender before the bombs were dropped.
- In contrast, the Japanese were ruthless soldiers who refused to surrender under any circumstances before the atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
- As shown in the excerpt above, Japanese troops would rather pass away or fight to the end than be captured or surrender.
- There were 1.74 million people killed or missing, and 94,000 people were injured.
- Because of the enormous number of losses, the Japanese were willing to fight to the death rather than surrender.
For more information about contradicts Leahy's opinion refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/24221448
