If someone is an advocate of the philosophy of judicial restraint, he or she believes question 4 options: that the meaning of the law tends to evolve over time. in looking only at the words of the constitution in order to understand its meaning. that the court should beware of overturning the judgments of popularly elected legislatures. the court should go beyond the words of the constitution or a statute to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions. that judges should consider legal questions rather than deciding political matters.

Question

02-05-2018
Social Studies

contestada

If someone is an advocate of the philosophy of judicial restraint, he or she believes question 4 options: that the meaning of the law tends to evolve over time. in looking only at the words of the constitution in order to understand its meaning. that the court should beware of overturning the judgments of popularly elected legislatures. the court should go beyond the words of the constitution or a statute to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions. that judges should consider legal questions rather than deciding political matters.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Which agency helps with disaster response

When a method returns an array reference, you include ____ with the return type in the method header. a. ( ) b. [ ] c. < > d. { }

4x/x^2+1 what the graph for the equation

Whats 22x34 to the power of 2.234

What are the most likely reasons a us corporation would open a factory in china? Check all that apply. a. to take advantage of affordable land pricesb. to take

Avogadro’s number was calculated by determining the number of atoms in

helppppppppppppppping me please

4 9/10 less the product of a number and 6 is no more than 18 1/8

Let u = <-4, 1>, v = <-1, 6>. Find -2u + 4v

A 38.0 kg satellite has a circular orbit with a period of 1.30 h and a radius of 7.90 × 106 m around a planet of unknown mass. If the magnitude of the gravitati

ahmedishaal ahmedishaal · Answer 1 · 2018-05-13T09:26:01+02:00

If someone is an advocate of the philosophy of judicial restraint, he or she believes "in looking only at the words of the Constitution in order to understand its meaning."

Judicial restraint is a theory of legal elucidation that urges judges to restrain the activity of their own power. It declares that judges should falter to strike down laws unless they are clearly illegal, however what considers clearly unlawful is itself a matter of some verbal confrontation.